• 13 years and three proposals, but club is no closer to moving
• Tesco’s offer, described as ‘the deal of the century’, in ruins
In the 131-year history of Everton, speckled as it is with distinction and moments of triumph, November 2009 will not be written up as the proud club’s sunniest landmark. Defeat by Hull City on Wednesday evening left David Moyes’ injury-raddled squad with one win in eight games and 14th position in a top flight Everton have inhabited for 55 consecutive years.
Moyes acknowledged after that 3-2 defeat that Everton could be dragged into a fight to retain their Premier League status this season and, facing the cauldron of Sunday’s derby against Liverpool with five members of the first-team squad absent with long-term injuries, described his central task as trying to get his remaining players “running around more”. In that disappointed mood, he dismissed thoughts of Everton’s estimable fifth-place finishes in the past two seasons as “gone, in the past”.
Also consigned to the past are Bill Kenwright’s plans for the club, which crumbled on the same night. The government, it emerged, had rejected the planning application for a new 50,000-seat stadium, which was part of a proposal by Tesco to build an enormous retail park in the small satellite town of Kirkby.
That was never a universally popular prospect; many even among the 59% of fans who voted in favour of the move in 2007 did so because it was the only option presented to expand the club’s capacity and, crucially, its earning potential. Everton fans are painfully aware that Goodison Park, a modern marvel when it was unveiled as the world’s first purpose-built football ground in 1892, has, in its present form, outlived its ability to generate the money required to compete in today’s Premier League.
Kenwright himself has always said he did not want to be the chairman who took Everton away from Goodison but that football’s modern economics demanded it. The prime attraction of Kirkby was not the town or the stadium itself, but the subsidy it would have received from Tesco. The superstore company had agreed to meet £52m of the stadium’s construction costs, leaving Everton to find only £78m, something the former chief executive Keith Wyness, who drove the proposal on, described as “the deal of the century”.
Wyness maintained that was the case yesterday, arguing the club would have raised much of the £78m by selling Goodison and the club’s former training ground at Bellefied, and securing naming rights for the new stadium. The club would have borrowed the rest, he said, and serviced the debt “easily” from the increased earnings at the larger ground.
Kenwright, who has said he has run out of money personally and has been trying unsuccessfully for three years to sell the club, also believed the new stadium, or even winning planning permission for it, could attract a buyer and investment to the club. All of that is consigned to the realms of speculation now, as Everton find themselves firmly rooted back at Goodison, with no alternative plan in any state of progress.
John Denham, the minister for communities and local government, supported the judgment of a planning inspector, Wendy Burden, following a public inquiry that opened fully a year ago. Burden recommended that Tesco’s application, for a 22,000 sq m superstore, a 50,000-seat stadium for Everton, and massive associated retail and commercial development, should be refused. Denham agreed that the plans “failed to provide good and inclusive design”, did not promote sustainable development or protect green space, and would economically damage the rest of Kirkby and its neighbouring towns by sucking retail custom away.
“The proposal would be likely to have a harmful effect on the vitality and viability of Kirkby, Bootle, Skelmersdale and St Helens and would conflict with policy to support and enhance the Liverpool city centre,” Denham said in his letter to Tesco’s planning consultants, DPP, on

